During the grading period, CIE provided us with copies of the evidence they were using, and we held several meetings with them via telephone during July. Write about this on Medium. While we recognised that the narrow grade widths in Paper 2 were far from ideal, we found that CIE made appropriate awarding decisions and did not find that the award was unsafe. It is normal for exam boards to routinely review the outcomes of their grading process and to make fine adjustments where appropriate once they have analysed all of the data from the exam series. There was also a substantial overseas entry for Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account.
The main difference between them is that includes speaking and listening in the overall grade whereas reports optional speaking and listening separately. Sign in or sign up. Looking for an EU Authority? CIE concluded that the grading was carried out appropriately, although they anticipate making some further refinements to their awarding this summer, as is standard practice for exam boards. Ultimately I’d like to know how close I might have been.
IGCSE English First Language – 0522 – Grade Boundaries
Both use the same assessments, students take the same papers and they have the same grade boundaries. If you have received this email in error, please let us know and then delete the original emails and any attachments.
CIE did tighten their outcomes at C and, to a lesser extent, at A. Link to this Report. Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. At the same time, CIE issued very detailed explanations to HMC and to other stakeholders, which included their initial analysis of the summer outcomes.
News story: CIE IGCSE® First Language English: Summer 2015
A site to help anyone submit a Freedom of Information request. Ultimately I’d like to know how close I might have been. While we recognised that the narrow grade widths in Coursewoek 2 were far from ideal, we found that CIE made appropriate awarding decisions and did not find that the award was unsafe. In November approximately 40, UK students enteredmost of whom achieved a D in summer Narrow grade widths provide particular challenges during awarding.
Try opening the logs in a new window. Innearlystudents tookcompared to 17, taking Write to your politician.
In response to those concerns, in October Ofqual reviewed the available technical evidence provided by CIE in July. The award was more severe and so more in line with GCSE standards than inbut there was no evidence to suggest that CIE had tightened the boundafies beyond what was intended and beyond the usual adjustments that exam boards routinely make on the basis of post-award evidence.
This supports similar analyses conducted by Cambridge Assessment. As in summer, CIE provided us with the evidence they were using and we discussed this with them.
Any dissemination or copying of this email or attachments is strictly prohibited unless you are the intended recipient or are responsible courzework delivering the message to the intended recipient.
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Summer As is normal practice, we have already turned our attention to the summer grading. Make a request Browse requests View authorities Journalist? There was also a substantial overseas entry for Grade Boundaries University of Cambridge.
McKenzie 25 January Delivered. For summerCIE proposed to tighten their grade standards.
News story: CIE IGCSE® First Language English: Summer | WISE Tutors
The information contained in this email may be subject to public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act and unless legally exempt from disclosure, the confidentiality of this email and your reply cannot be guaranteed.
Reviews of summer awarding Following the issue of results, concerns were expressed by schools that were unhappy with their results. Paper 2 marks are added to those of either Paper 3 ocursework 4 according to the papers the student has taken to determine the overall grade.
UK entries for are far higher than for because only is approved by the Department for Education for use in maintained schools. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use. Awarding is more difficult when cohorts change significantly.
We were aware that on one paper Paper 2 there were only four marks between grades C and Courseworm. Are you the owner of any commercial copyright on this page?