In fact she did come to a conclusion, but not the conclusion I was expecting. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. Dillard states that humans do not belong on this planet, where things are not seemingly made to accommodate our survival. Adding onto your point about the burden o the human intellect, we try to plan our lives and project our lives as a path we can follow. Often times we still find ourselves drifting aimlessly.
Understanding Sojourner by Annie Dillard by Chloe Lai on Prezi
This essay was surprisingly easy to comprehend and I was able to isolate a possible thesis Dillard may have been trying to support. As a metaphor, this idea is also passed on to human society. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here But, Dillard managed to link the adverse planet we live on to actually explaining how planets themselves are sojourners.
You are commenting using your Google account. But I disagree with Dillard on one point: You are commenting using your Google account. Dillard is in an obvious state of confusion as to what her purpose is on a celestial body in the middle of a vast, vast, universe. You are commenting using your Twitter account. Notify me of new comments via email.
However, humans on the other dullard, have the intellect to contemplate this. This ties to the mangroves because humans still thrive and survive when they come together as societies.
As the mangroves represent the human world and society, this idea is then extended upon this setting. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Intuition and desire to understand all around oneself will go to tuesis and be swept blank.
You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your WordPress. To me this essay has a bit of an existential feel to it. These are very human qualities which serve to link mangroves and humans.
On Annie Dillard’s “Sojourner”
You are commenting using your Google account. This idea links to humans as well. To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Email tgesis Address never made public.
You are commenting using your Facebook account. In this essay, Dillard compares mangrove trees sojougners humans, then comparing both to planets such as Earth. It does seem like Dillard wants to live as a creature driven by instinct, in harmony with the natural world.
I thought that once Dillard had established the clear connection between mangroves and humans that she would end it there. You are commenting using your WordPress. Her contradiction sometimes seem to be on purpose, because she does not know the true meaning of the universe too. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Adding onto your point about the burden o the human intellect, we try to plan our lives and project our lives as a path we can follow.